The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued a final rule under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act of 2020, detailing how certain industries may continue to use hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in specific applications.
HFCs are powerful greenhouse gases, and this action is part of the U.S. strategy to phase down their production and consumption to mitigate climate change.
What the Rule Covers
The final rule:
Key Takeaways for Businesses
The rule has several key takeaways for industry stakeholders:
Effective Date and Reference
On 12 September 2025, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has launched the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard for Cosmetic Products, an interactive platform designed to provide real-time access to adverse event reports related to cosmetic products. The launch, announced via a FDA press release, supports the FDA’s broader modernization strategy and responds to growing demand for transparency in product safety.
The dashboard covers a wide range of cosmetic categories, such as moisturizers, shampoos, conditioners, hair dyes, and tattoos.
FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
The launch of the cosmetic products dashboard is part of the FDA’s borader push for transparency, complementing earlier initiatives such as real-time reporting of adverse events and medication errors for drugs and therapeutic biologics.
The new platform centralizes reports exclusively related to cosmetic products, including those required under the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA) and voluntary submissions from healthcare professionals, consumers, and cosmetic industry professionals.
MoCRA requires companies are required to submit serious adverse event reports for cosmetic products to the FDA. Other stakeholders, inlcuding healthcare professionals, salon professionals, cosmetologists, and consumers are encouraged to voluntarily report incidents to strengthen safety surveillance.
While the dashboard enhances transparency, the FDA notes that the data is intended for monitoring purposes only. Companies are expected to evaluate safety signals proactively and take mitigation measures when risks are identified.
On September 17, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has released a draft risk evaluation for Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The agency’s initial findings indicate that D4 may pose unreasonable risks to human health and the environment under certain conditions of use.
Key Findings: Risks to Human Health
EPA identified 23 conditions of use (COUs) where workers face potential risks, particularly during the manufacture of D4 and in processing activities involving adhesives, sealants, paints, and coatings. In addition, one consumer COU involving D4 in paints and coatings was flagged for unreasonable risk.
The draft evaluation clarifies that these determinations do not assume the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). While PPE may reduce exposure, EPA emphasizes that risk exists without its consistent use. Importantly, no unreasonable risks were identified for the general population.
Key Findings: Environmental Risks
EPA’s draft evaluation also highlights seven COUs where D4 could pose risk to the environment. For another 18 environmental COUs and two human health COUs, the agency has not yet reached preliminary conclusions.
Scientific Insights
The draft incorporates recent studies on bioaccumulation and biomagnification of D4. Studies show D4 can accumulate in aquatic organisms but has a low likelihood of biomagnifying through the food chain, as fish are able to metabolize ingested D4. These findings suggest that while exposure occurs, accumulation across trophic levels may be limited.
Public Comment and Review
EPA is inviting public comments until November 17, 2025, through docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0443 on Regulations.gov.
Two public meetings are planned:
Participants may submit written feedback or request to present oral comments by the deadlines listed on the SACC website.
Next Steps
Following the comment period and peer review, EPA will finalize the risk evaluation. If unreasonable risks are confirmed, the agency may propose risk management actions to reduce exposure to D4 in workplaces, consumer settings, and the environment.
From
1 July 2026, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) will begin publishing the
names of companies that have submitted classification and labelling (C&L)
notifications under the CLP Regulation. The name of every notifier will be made
publicly available in the C&L Inventory in accordance with the amended
Article 42 of the CLP, introduced by Regulation (EU)
2024/2865 published in the EU
Official Journal on 20 November 2024.
Confidentiality Requests
Before June 2026
Companies
wishing to keep their name confidential must update their dossiers and submit a
justification by 30 June 2026. Unless confidentiality is granted, ECHA will make
notifier names publicly accessible from 1 July 2026. ECHA also released an
updated CLP
notification manual in June 2025 to guide
companies through the process.
CLP
Notification Requirements
Manufacturers
and importers placing hazardous substances on the EU market are required to
notify ECHA within a month of placing the substance on the market. Article 40
(1) of the CLP (Classification, Labelling and Packaging) Regulation outlines
the data that must be included in the Substance dataset. The following details
are needed for CLP notification (relevant IUCLID section in brackets):
· Notifier details: Name and contact information (from
REACH-IT).
· Confidentiality request (notifier name): Justification and category must be provided.
· Notifier contact person: To be specified in section 1.1.
· Substance identity: According to Annex VI sections 2.1–2.3.4
(sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.4).
· Confidentiality request (IUPAC name): Provide a publishable name for the C&L
inventory and justification.
· Classification: As required under the CLP Regulation
(section 2.1).
· No classification justification: Required if the substance is not
classified under all hazard classes.
· Reason for classification: Based on supporting data.
· Concentration limits, M-factors, acute
toxicity estimates:
Where applicable, with justification referencing Annex I (section 13).
· Label elements: Hazard pictograms, signal words, hazard
statements.
ECHA has removed the harmonised
classification of titanium dioxide (TiO₂, CAS 13463-67-7) from the C&L
Inventory and updated the registry of intentions, following the Court of
Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling of 1 August 2025 annulling the
classification. Related guidance documents on classification and labelling have
also been deleted from ECHA’s website.
Annex VI to CLP Amended
The Court’s judgment directly
amends Annex VI to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP)
Regulation. The following entries no longer apply to titanium dioxide:
Immediate Effect for
Businesses
Because the ruling has direct
legal effect, the removal of the titanium dioxide entry does not require a
further amendment (ATP) to CLP. Companies can already update safety data sheets
(SDS) and labels to reflect the deletion of the harmonised classification.
Implications for Industry
The removal has significant implications for manufacturers and importers of paints, coatings, plastics, and other products containing TiO₂. Labelling requirements are now simplified, and suppliers can base hazard communication on their own product assessments rather than the harmonised entry.
The full text of the ruling of the European Court of Justice on the classification of titanium dioxide can be found here.
On 24 September 2025, the
European Council approved the introduction of a “stop-the-clock” mechanism for
the revised Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. The
measure, part of the Commission’s Omnibus VI simplification package, delays the
entry into application of the new rules to 1 January 2028.
Purpose: Legal Certainty and
Simplification
The mechanism is designed to
provide legal certainty for businesses and to avoid a fragmented regulatory
framework. Without the postponement, different provisions of the revised CLP
would have applied on different dates, creating additional compliance
challenges for companies.
The alignment of deadlines covers
obligations on:
By postponing these obligations,
the European Council aims to give companies, particularly SMEs, more time to
adapt to the new requirements while ensuring continued protection of health and
the environment.
Background: Original Deadlines
The revised CLP Regulation
entered into force on 10 December 2024, with the majority of obligations
initially scheduled to apply from 1 July 2026, and some provisions from 2027
(see more details here).
The “stop-the-clock” mechanism shifts all these dates to 1 January 2028,
creating a single, harmonised starting point for compliance.
Next Steps in the Legislative
Process
Following the European Council’s
approval, negotiations will continue with the European Parliament to finalise
the regulation. The measure forms part of the broader Omnibus VI package, which
seeks to simplify EU chemicals legislation while maintaining high levels of
health and environmental protection.
On 16 September 2025, the
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) announced the expansion of its ECHA CHEM
database to include regulatory data on chemicals. The upgrade means that, in
addition to substance information, users can now access details on regulatory
processes and legal obligations under several EU laws.
Integration of Key EU
Regulations
In this release, ECHA CHEM
incorporates regulatory processes and lists from the following chemicals
regulations and directives:
Under REACH, the update covers
the list of restricted substances and the restriction process, the
Authorisation List and ECHA’s recommendations for inclusion, substances of very
high concern (SVHC) and the Candidate List, as well as dossier and substance
evaluation.
This integration provides a
single point of access to chemical identity data, classification and labelling
information, REACH registration details, and other regulatory lists.
On 24 September 2025, ECHA further announced that the European positive lists under the Drinking Water Directive are now available in ECHA CHEM. The information is searchable, can be filtered by material type, and is linked with relevant data collected under REACH and CLP.
Improved Access and
Transparency
The expanded system aims to
improve transparency and efficiency by centralising regulatory and substance
data. Companies, regulators, and other stakeholders can now more easily assess
compliance obligations, restrictions, and potential risks related to chemical
use.
Webinar Recording Available
ECHA presented the new features
in a webinar on 23 September 2025. The session is now available for viewing and
includes demonstrations of the platform and explanations of the first set of
regulatory process and obligation lists. The recording can be accessed here.
The UK Health and Safety
Executive (HSE) has launched a six-month public consultation on a proposed
restriction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in firefighting foams
under UK REACH. The consultation will run until 18 February 2026.
Scope of the Proposal
The restriction targets PFAS used
in firefighting foams, covering their manufacture, placing on the market, use,
storage, and disposal. PFAS are defined to include substances containing at
least one fully fluorinated carbon atom (-CF₂ or -CF₃) without hydrogen,
chlorine, bromine, or iodine substituents. The proposal includes transition
periods tailored to sectors to allow operators time to adopt PFAS-free alternatives.
Risks and Rationale
According to the Annex 15
restriction dossier, PFAS in firefighting foams present significant threats to
human health and the environment. Their persistence, mobility, and potential
for bioaccumulation mean that existing controls are insufficient to protect
against exposure. Firefighting foams are highlighted as a key source of PFAS
emissions, especially via runoff into soil and water systems when used
outdoors.
Next Steps
Once the consultation closes, the
HSE will review stakeholder submissions and issue its final opinion. That
opinion will be forwarded to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food &
Rural Affairs and to the devolved administrations for a decision.
The consultation documents,
including the full Annex 15 dossier, are available on the HSE site here
India's Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has issued a significant policy amendment via Notification No. 28/2025-26, revising the export obligation (EO) period under the Advance Authorization Scheme for imports exempted from mandatory Quality Control Orders (QCOs) issued by the Department of Chemicals & Petrochemicals (DCPC).
Key Amendment to Export Obligation Period
·
Previous
Provision (FTP 2023 - Para 2.03(A) (1) (g)): EO
period was limited to 180 days from the date of import clearance for chemical
products exempted from QCOs.
· Revised Provision: The EO period for such imports is now fully aligned with Para 4.40 of the Handbook of Procedures, i.e., 18 months from the date of clearance.
This change effectively removes the previously reduced 180-day limit for QCO-exempt imports, placing them on the standard 18-month timeline.
Implications for
Trade Community
·
Increased
Flexibility:
Exporters, EOUs, and SEZ units now have a standardized 18-month EO period,
improving planning and execution of export orders.
·
Policy
Simplification:
Removes the special reduced EO timeline for chemical product imports under QCO
exemptions.
·
Trade
Facilitation:
Supports operational ease and compliance consistency across sectors importing
regulated inputs under Advance Authorisation.
Effective Date
The amendment took immediate effect from the date of publication (28 August 2025).
The Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers (Department of
Chemicals and Petrochemicals) has issued three Gazette notifications amending
the timelines for the enforcement of the Quality Control Orders (QCOs) for Ethylene
Dichloride, Polycarbonate, and Vinyl Chloride Monomer under the Bureau of
Indian Standards Act, 2016.
The amendments, notified on 16 September 2025, extended the enforcement date of these QCOs to 12 September 2026.
Impact on Industry
These QCOs mandate that the notified chemicals must conform
to Indian Standards and bear the BIS Standard Mark, ensuring quality,
safety, and compliance for domestic use as well as imports.
By extending the deadlines, the government provides additional time for industries and
stakeholders to align with the mandatory certification requirements, facilitating a smoother transition into full compliance.
On August 28, 2025, China’s national standardization authorities officially published the 18th batch of national standards for 2025. Among them are several standards directly relevant to chemical management, fire suppression chemicals, and hazardous substance restrictions. The full texts of these standards are now accessible through the national standards system.
Fire Suppression Chemicals
Key standards introduced for fire
protection and suppression include:
These standards define chemical
composition, performance requirements, and safe use, providing guidance for the
production and application of fire suppression systems.
Grain Storage and Other
Chemical Agents
This standard specifies requirements
for safe management, usage methods, and protective measures when applying
chemicals in grain storage.
Hazardous Substance Limits in
Materials and Products
Two new standards set limits on
hazardous substances in products and materials:
These standards set limits on
hazardous chemicals to ensure products comply with environmental and safety
regulations.
Strengthening Chemical and
Environmental Safety
The release of these updates
reflect China’s ongoing efforts to strengthen chemical safety, environmental
protection, and hazardous substance control in both industrial and consumer
sectors.
On August 20, 2025, South Korea announced a revision of the enforcement
decree of K-REACH Act (Act on the Registration and Evaluation of Chemical
Substances). The amendment follows the revision of the K-REACH Act (Law No. 20860, promulgated on March 25, 2025, and effective from September 26, 2025). The amendment designates the Korea
Environmental Preservation Institute (KEPI), as defined under Article 59 of the
Framework Act on Environmental Policy, as a newly eligible institution to be entrusted with related governmental tasks under K-REACH.
As a result, this amendment to the Enforcement Decree further specifies KEPI's the scope of responsibilities.
Key Contents
The specific tasks to be assigned will be announced separately through an official notice.
Public Comment Submission
Institutions, organizations, or individuals who wish to
express their opinions on this proposed amendment must submit their comments by
September 29, 2025, to MoE.
On 9 September 2025, Taiwan’s Ministry of
Environment (MEO) announced that nationwide drinking water tests for PFAS (per-
and polyfluoroalkyl substances) are in compliance with national limits. At the
same time, the ministry issued guideline values for six additional emerging
contaminants to strengthen water quality management. The new substances
include germanium, thallium, boron, microcystin-LR, DEHP (a
plasticizer), and the total sum of 20 PFAS compounds.
Previous PFAS Regulation Efforts
In November 2024, Taiwan revised its drinking water quality
standards to include PFAS limits, becoming one of the first countries in Asia
to adopt such measures. Under the updated standards, PFOA + PFOS must
not exceed 50 ng/L and PFOS + PFHxS must not exceed 70 ng/L.
Since the start of 2025, testing has been conducted at 130 large-scale
water treatment plants, covering 91% of the national water supply,
with all results meeting the standards.
Test Results Confirm Compliance Nationwide
Analysis shows that:
Rolling Updates in Line with International Trends
According to the Ministry, guideline values for emerging
contaminants will be continuously updated, following expert consultation
and international trends such as the EU Drinking Water Directive.
The newly introduced guideline for ‘total PFAS (20
compounds)’ is 100 ng/L. Local environmental agencies and water
utilities have been instructed to integrate these new values into their monitoring
regimes.
The Ministry also noted that future updates will
follow international developments, with the National Environmental Research
Institute enhancing testing methods and capacity, including total
organofluorine screening techniques, to ensure Taiwan’s drinking water remains
safe and aligned with global standards.
On 19 September 2025, Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), and Ministry of Environment (MOE) jointly released the 2026 notification schedule for new chemical substances (including low production volume new chemicals). The full schedule, comprehensive details, and guidance documents are available on the METI portal.
Notifications are required for new chemicals that are manufactured or
imported into Japan under the Chemical Substances Control Law (CSCL).
Annual Update of Notification Timetable
Japan revises its new chemical notification schedule each year in
September. The 2025 schedule was announced on 19 September 2024 (more
details can be found here), and the newly published timetable covers October 2025 through December 2026.
Notification
Schedule (2026)
Submissions will be accepted in 10 rounds during the period October 2025-December 2026). The detailed schedule is given in the table below:
Round |
Deadline for preliminary
screening* |
Deadline for submitting notification documents |
1 |
6 October 2025 |
19 December 2025 |
2 |
18 December 2025 |
5 March 2026 |
3 |
8 January 2026 |
3 April 2026 |
4 |
10 February 2026 |
11 May 2026 |
5 |
16 March 2026 |
16 June 2026 |
6 |
15 April 2026 |
9 July 2026 |
7 |
9 June 2026 |
31 August 2026 |
8 |
8 July 2026 |
2 October 2026 |
9 |
30 July 2026 |
26 October 2026 |
10 |
9 September 2026 |
1 December 2026 |
*Submissions are accepted only until 3 p.m. on the designated date. Missed deadlines automatically roll over to the next round.
Documentation Required
Applicants must prepare the following documentation in line with CSCL requirements and the official manual:
For substances already reviewed and notified, applicants may resubmit using a copy of the previous notification result. In such cases, no new review is required, provided the notification is submitted by any of the scheduled deadlines.
Future
Outlook
Although METI has not yet disclosed the 2027 notification schedule, it is anticipated to be made public in September 2026.
The Australian Industrial
Chemicals Introduction Scheme (AICIS) has announced that all organisations
which imported or manufactured industrial chemicals for commercial purposes
between 1 September 2024 and 31 August 2025 are required to
submit their annual declaration by 30 November 2025.
Who needs to declare
Any “introducer” under the
AICIS—meaning anyone who manufactures or imports industrial chemicals—is
obligated to make an annual declaration if they carried out introductions
during that period. The declaration affirms that all chemical introductions
comply with the requirements under the Industrial Chemicals Act 2019.
What the declaration involves
Introducers will need to specify
which of the six introduction categories applies to each chemical they
manufactured or imported:
Some exempted introduction types
will also require a post-introduction declaration.
Resources and guidance
AICIS has released a new video to
guide introducers through the declaration process, which can be accessed here.
There is also a categorisation guide to help determine which introduction
category applies.
Why this matters
Submissions of annual
declarations are essential for AICIS to ensure that industrial chemical
introductions remain compliant with Australia’s regulatory framework, intended
to protect health, safety, and the environment. Introducers declaring under the
correct categories help maintain transparency and regulatory oversight.
Brazil’s national health regulator, ANVISA, has introduced new sanitary requirements for regenerated cellulose films used in food packaging, in a move aimed at strengthening consumer safety and aligning domestic standards with regional trade partners. The regulation, known as RDC No. 992/2025, was approved on 27 August 2025. It will come into force in February 2026, six months after publication.
Aligning with Mercosur
The measure incorporates provisions from the Mercosur Resolution GMC No. 16/2025, ensuring that Brazil’s rules are harmonised with those of its neighbours. Regenerated cellulose films, thin sheets made from purified cellulose sourced from wood or cotton, are widely used in the food industry, including as wrappers for confectionery, baked goods and processed meats.
Key Provisions
Under the new rules, manufacturers will need to:
Produce films under Good Manufacturing Practices.
Restrict production to three categories: uncoated films, films coated with cellulose derivatives, and films coated with plastics.
Use only substances authorised in Anvisa’s Instrução Normativa No. 396/2025 or in previously established regulations.
Ensure that films comply with strict migration limits, preventing harmful chemicals from leaching into food.
Films that are printed or coloured face additional controls. For example, primary aromatic amines, a class of chemicals linked to health risks, must not migrate into food above trace levels of 0.01 mg per kilogram.
Industry and Consumer Impact
The move updates and replaces a previous 2002 regulation and is expected to modernise oversight of packaging materials that come into direct contact with food. Anvisa says the changes will increase transparency, requiring manufacturers and importers to make the chemical composition of their products available to authorities when requested. Industry experts say the resolution will also facilitate trade, given its alignment with European Union and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reference lists, which are commonly used benchmarks for food-contact materials.
Enforcement
Failure to comply will be treated as a sanitary infraction under Brazilian law, carrying administrative, civil and criminal liabilities.The food packaging sector has until February 2026 to adapt to the new standards. For further details on the Resolution you can find it here (in Portughese).
Switzerland is set to tighten its
national rules on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with a stand-alone
regulation aimed at reducing pollution and supporting farms. The National
Council's Committee on the Environment, Spatial Planning and Energy (CEATE-N)
has proposed measures instructing the Federal Council to curb PFAS emissions
and explore independent limit values for PFAS in drinking water, separate from
the European Drinking Water Directive.
CEATE-N approved a revised Motion
25.3421 to enforce stricter national measures on PFAS. The motion aims to
provide timely solutions for affected sectors, support agricultural operations,
and balance environmental and economic considerations when defining PFAS
limits. It emphasizes reducing PFAS production and use, especially where safer
alternatives exist, while a minority of the committee advocates closer
alignment with EU chemical legislation due to potential health and
environmental concerns.
In addition, CEATE-N supported
retroactive compensation for PFAS-related site remediation under the OTAS fund,
effective from April 1, 2025, aligning with provisions for other types of
pollution under the Environmental Protection Act.
Beyond PFAS, the committee
discussed broader environmental and energy initiatives:
CEATE-N’s proposals mark a
significant step in Switzerland’s commitment to
environmental protection,
sustainable energy, and innovative trade policies.
On September 5, 2025. Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and
Trade (MOIT) has opened consultation on a draft Government Decree that will
operationalize the new Law on Chemicals No. 69/2025/QH15. The Decree—described
by MOIT’s Chemicals Agency as the “backbone” for implementation—details state
management of chemical activities and control of hazardous chemicals in
products and goods.
Why it matters
The Decree will translate the 2025 Law on Chemicals
(effective January 1, 2026) into practice—setting procedures for new-chemical
registration, information management and confidentiality, and controls on
hazardous chemicals in products. It will also modernize the regulatory regime
following Decree 113/2017/ND-CP and its 2022 amendments, with an emphasis on
administrative simplification and digital government.
Structure at a glance
According to MOIT, the draft features 5 Chapters and 32
Articles:
Legal basis and timetable
Policy orientation
MOIT notes the Decree is being built in the spirit of Resolution
66-NQ/TW (April 30, 2025) of the Politburo on renewing law-making and
law-enforcement to drive development—emphasizing practical, system-wide, and
pro-growth reforms, including stronger decentralization and streamlined
procedures.
What could change for businesses
Administrative reform focus
In line with Government directives on cutting business
conditions, simplifying administrative procedures, and decentralizing decision-making,
the drafting team is reviewing additional reductions and simplifications beyond
those already approved under national programs (e.g., Decisions 1661/QD-TTg and
1015/QD-TTg).
Next steps
Indonesia’s Ministry of Trade has issued Regulation No. 20
of 2025 on the import of chemicals, hazardous substances, and certain minerals,
replacing Regulation No. 36 of 2023 (as amended). The rule was promulgated on 30
June 2025 and took effect on 29 August 2025.
Scope and Coverage
The regulation establishes import controls for the following
categories:
Legal Basis and Key Dates
Import Licensing and Verification
Importers must hold appropriate business permits and import
approvals before goods enter Indonesia’s customs territory, using the regime
defined in the regulation:
The regulation also formalizes verification/technical
tracing by authorized surveyors and the issuance of Laporan Surveyor (LS) where
required. Definitions for IT, IP, PI and LS are standardized in Article 1.
Electronic Realisation Reporting
Holders of PI or LS must submit electronic import
realisation reports, covering both realised and unrealised volumes, in
accordance with the trade licensing framework administered by the Ministry of
Trade. Non-compliance triggers administrative sanctions.
Treatment in Special Regimes (FTZ/SEZ/Bonded)
The regulation distinguishes the treatment of goods entering
Free Trade Zones (KPBPB), Special Economic Zones (KEK), and Bonded Warehouses
(TPB):
Transitional Provisions
Existing IT/IP/PI documents remain valid until expiry and
may be amended or extended under the new framework. However, previously issued PI
for Certain Chemicals (BKT) under API-P/API-U are expressly revoked via the
INATRADE system. Surveyor (LS) documents issued under prior rules remain valid
through completion of the relevant importation.
Compliance Actions for Industry
Assess zone strategy: imports routed via TPB/KPBPB/KEK may obtain warehousing efficiencies, but domestic release will trigger full import controls; certain categories are regulated at all stages including entry.
Argentina has introduced sweeping changes to the way pesticides and other plant protection products are approved, imported and labelled. The National Service of Agri-Food Health and Quality (SENASA) issued Resolution 458/2025, replacing more than a decade of previous rules. The new regulation creates a single national registry for agrochemicals, strengthens oversight of imports, and makes compliance with the United Nations Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for chemical classification mandatory.
National Registry
Under the reform, a National Registry of Plant Protection Products has been established, consolidating existing pesticide registrations into a single system. Companies seeking to register products will now rely primarily on sworn declarations (declaraciones juradas) for approval, subject to subsequent audits by SENASA. Trials, field tests, and experimental use, however, will still require prior authorisation. The government says the shift is designed to reduce bureaucratic delays while maintaining strict controls to protect public health and the environment.
Import Controls and “Convergence” Countries
The resolution introduces a two-tiered approach to pesticide imports, distinguishing between countries with “regulatory convergence” and those without.
Imports from nations such as the European Union, United States, Brazil and Japan will benefit from a simplified, fast-track registration system. In some cases, provisional registrations lasting up to two years will be permitted.
Imports from non-convergent countries must undergo full evaluation, including new efficacy trials and toxicological assessments.
Mandatory Global Harmonised System (GHS) Labels
One of the most significant changes is the mandatory adoption of the UN’s GHS system for chemical labelling and classification.
All pesticide products must comply with the 9th edition of the GHS “Purple Book”, covering hazard categories, pictograms and safety information.
Companies have three years to bring existing products into compliance
This brings Argentina closer to global chemical safety standards already adopted in much of Latin America, the EU and the US.
Reevaluation Powers and Environmental Safeguards
The resolution also grants SENASA expanded powers to re-evaluate pesticide approvals if new scientific data emerges or if products show unexpected environmental risks, resistance problems or residue concerns. Such reviews may result in tighter restrictions, lower maximum residue limits (MRLs), modifications of approved uses, or even outright cancellations.
Broader Context
Argentina is one of the world’s largest exporters of soybeans, maize and wheat, and among the top consumers of pesticides in Latin America. The regulatory overhaul comes as neighbouring countries, including Brazil and Chile, update their own pesticide frameworks. SENASA is seeking to modernise and unify the country’s pesticide laws under a single, internationally aligned framework.
Timeline
25 September 2025 — Resolution enters into force, 90 days after publication.
September 2028 — Final deadline for all products to comply with GHS classification and labelling.
For more information, you can find the Resolution here (in Spanish).
The Mexican government has introduced a federal programme, published in the Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF), setting out a framework for coordinated action across priority sectors.
Background
Unlike decrees, which establish binding rules, a government programme serves as a strategic plan. It defines objectives, guiding principles, and institutional responsibilities. By publishing it in the DOF, authorities give the initiative official status and ensure transparency. The new programme reflects the administration’s commitment to strengthening governance and the protection of he environment through long-term planning, but lacks the authority that regulations or decrees have. Officials said it was designed to modernise public administration and improve accountability at both the federal and regional levels.
Key Measures
The programme outlines five major objectives for 2025–2030:
Biodiversity and ecosystems – conserve, protect, and use ecosystems sustainably, treating them as pillars for poverty reduction, social equality, and human rights, with special focus on indigenous and Afro-Mexican communities.
Restoration – restore priority ecosystems with interdisciplinary, cross-sector participation, ensuring justice and inclusion in environmental recovery.
Water security – guarantee the human right to water through sustainable management of rivers, aquifers, and watersheds, while protecting ecosystems.
Climate action – strengthen adaptation and low-carbon strategies, integrating pollution control to protect public health, ecosystems, and critical infrastructure.
Human-centred ecology – promote an ecological, humanistic policy with citizen participation, environmental culture, and access to justice supported by reliable information and a territorial perspective.
By combining these elements, the government seeks to build a coherent framework that avoids duplication of efforts and strengthens institutional efficiency.
Reactions
Businesses and civil society groups are expected to review the programme’s provisions closely. For some sectors, particularly those under strict regulatory oversight, the programme may open new opportunities while also imposing additional responsibilities.
Next Steps
The federal government will now focus on implementation. Agencies are expected to issue complementary guidelines, and funding mechanisms may be clarified in the months ahead. Officials stressed that the programme should be seen as a “living framework” one that may evolve as conditions change, but which provides a structured path toward Mexico’s development priorities.
For further details you can find the Programme here (in Spanish).
On 8 September 2025, Singapore notified the WTO (G/TBT/N/SGP/76) of a proposal to control six mercury-added lighting products as Hazardous Substances under the Environmental Protection and Management Act (EPMA), to implement decisions adopted at Minamata Convention COP-5 (October 2023). Once the regulation takes effect, import, export, and manufacture of the listed products will not be allowed. The measure is planned for Gazette publication in Q2 2026, with phased prohibitions on 1 January 2027 and 1 January 2028. Stakeholders may submit comments until 7 November 2025.
Scope: Products and HS Codes
The proposal covers six categories of mercury-added lamps used for general lighting, with associated HS 2022 codes listed in the notification:
Timeline and Entry into Force
Legal Mechanism and Convention Alignment
Controls will be implemented under the EPMA and related hazardous substances regulations to fulfil Singapore’s obligations following the Minamata Convention amendments adopted at COP-5. The notification specifies no change to other existing EPMA requirements; the action specifically phases out the six mercury-added product categories listed above.
Compliance Implications for Industry
Once the regulation is in force, the listed lamps cannot be imported, exported, or manufactured in Singapore. Companies should:
Next Steps and Contact
The National Environment Agency (NEA) is the responsible agency. Stakeholders should provide written comments by 7 November 2025 per the contact details in the WTO TBT notice. Final adoption and entry-into-force dates will be confirmed by Government Gazette notice ahead of the 2027/2028 milestones.
New Zealand’s Environmental
Protection Authority (EPA) has confirmed the phase-out of chlorpyrifos, with
strict deadlines now in place for the use and disposal of the pesticide. The
move follows the EPA’s July 2025 decision to revoke all approvals for chlorpyrifos,
citing unacceptable risks to human health and the environment.
Disposal Timelines Announced
A notice published in the New
Zealand Gazette (2025-au4759) sets out a staged withdrawal:
After 8 January 2027, no import
or manufacture of chlorpyrifos or chlorpyrifos-containing products will be
permitted. The full list of affected substances is available in the New Zealand Gazette notice.
EPA Guidance
In a statement on 3 September
2025, EPA urged users to prepare for disposal well ahead of the deadlines and
to consider safe alternatives. The agency stressed that holders of chlorpyrifos
stocks must take responsibility for ensuring safe and timely disposal to avoid
non-compliance.
The reassessment and phase-out
reflect a broader regulatory shift in New Zealand, aligning with international
action to reduce risks associated with organophosphate insecticides.