In a recent insightful discussion at the Asian Chemical Forum, a diverse panel of scientists, industry experts, European Commission regulators, and academic researchers, emphasized the importance of a global approach to tackling challenges facing Europe and their global impact.
Global Economy and Shared Concerns
Mr Mereu felt that the panel was well organized and had a diversity that provided a platform for an engaging and interactive debate. A key takeaway, Mr Mereu highlighted, is the interconnected nature of issues within the global economy. "Issues faced in Europe are not isolated; they reflect a broader global concern that affects jurisdictions outside of Europe, like India," Mr Mereu noted, suggesting the possibility of similar regulatory adjustments by the Indian government.
Tackling 'Forever Chemicals': A Case-by-Case Approach
Addressing the complexities surrounding 'forever chemicals,' or PFASs, Mr Mereu called for a nuanced approach. With Europe leading the way with its proposal to restrict around 14,000 substances, the expertcalled for a case-by-case assessment to address different concerns and substitution possibilities. This balanced view underlines the need for detailed consideration based on use and exposure, rather than broad generalizations.
Need for Categorization in PFAS Treatment
Mr Mereu underlined the necessity of not treating all PFASs in the same way. Subcategorizations based on exposure scenarios, availability of alternatives, and socio-economic impacts is crucial for fair industry regulation. This approach suggests a tailored strategy to deal with the diverse range of PFASs.
Three Industrial Priorities for PFASs
Mr Mereu felt that the main focus for the industry should be:
- 1. Joint identification of priorities and sub-categories for PFASs.
- 2. Finding alternatives where possible, along with derogations for critical uses such as in the medical and
automotive sectors.
- 3. Balance specific uses of PFASs, distinguishing between replaceable and irreplaceable applications.
Advocating Harmonization and Progress
In the context of Article 58 (2) and its impact on Annex XIV, Mr Mereu advised on the need for closer harmonization between the European interpretation and the UN guidelines. With regard to the expansion of the hazard categories, Mr Mereu emphasized Europe's progressive stance compared to the GHS.
The Future of Asian Chemical Summit
Mr Mereu concluded by praising the framework and approach of the Asian Chemical Forum and emphasized the importance of maintaining a global perspective in these discussions. Not only should the focus be on Asia, but insights from Europe and the United States are also essential in a globally interconnected industry. He was enthusiastic about the fusion of attending a premier conference in the admired venue of India.